Over the past few
weeks, our class has examined documents that describe fundamental human rights to
which all individuals are entitled. An example of a document that acknowledges
human rights is the United States’ Declaration of Independence. In the Statement
of Human Rights in the Declaration of Independence, it affirms that all humans
deserve the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
As I analyze the
meaning of these human rights, I realize that the third of these rights, the
right to pursue happiness, seems extremely difficult to enforce. Isn’t what
constitutes happiness different for all humans?
I have identified
three main reasons to support my position:
1) There is no way
for the government to enforce that every citizen will have opportunities to be
happy.
2)
In a capitalist society where we are competing and working for the best
lifestyle we can live, and it is not the government’s role to create an equal
socio-economic playing field.
3) The world-wide problems
that have affected past generations, and continue to affect our generation, make
it difficult to prioritize the pursuit of happiness.
The first point described above means that defending everyone’s right to pursue happiness is essentially an empty promise. In my opinion, it does not seem possible that a legal system can monitor citizens’ opportunities to pursue happiness. In a country with over 300 million citizens, it is impossible for the government to make sure that every individual person has an opportunity to be happy. To make matters more complicated, there is no way to tell what makes someone happy (without personally knowing them). What may make one happy might not make another happy. For this reason, the government has no way of knowing if one’s right to pursue happiness is being violated or not.
My second problem
with the “pursuit of happiness” is that our society thrives and progresses
based on a competitive mindset. For
good or for bad, the government is not set up to makes sure that everyone has
the same opportunities and choices. By the same token, citizens don’t work to
make everyone equally happy. We work to make ourselves happy. I do not mean to say that Americans are
selfish and live only for their own pleasure, but the motivation behind making
money is usually for personal gain.
It is not to give everyone the same set of opportunities. In our
capitalist society, most people work to live the most comfortable lives they
can, not to create a society where every single citizen is content.
My third reason
for why this “human right” is not enforceable is that the problems in our world
often demand our government’s more immediate attention than citizens’
happiness. For example, how could the government promise citizens the right to
pursue happiness while drafting men to the battlefields of Vietnam of
Afghanistan? My generation is experiencing a problem that I fear may impinge on
our pursuit of happiness as well. Generations before us have been exploiting the
world’s natural resources, ruining ecosystems, producing harmful greenhouse-gas
emissions that contribute to climate change, and ultimately endangering the
future of human existence. Now it
is my generation’s responsibility to
clean up the mess that previous generations created. The need to confront these problems seems to impede my right
to pursue happiness. Does this
mean that our generation does not have the opportunity to live for fun and
excitement, but rather must dedicate our lives to fixing the problems created before
us?
All in all, I
strongly believe that the pursuit of happiness should not be classified as a
human right. The idea that all citizens
deserve to pursue happiness seems morally desirable, but there is no way for a
government to enforce it.
No comments:
Post a Comment