Should a country's
government make laws against harming the environment, or should there just be
various kinds of financial incentives given to individuals who live
environmentally conscious life-styles?
Today,
our world faces a crisis that was not attended to sufficiently in the past. With
the rate of pollution that we are releasing into our atmosphere, into our water,
and onto our land, we are facing consequences. We are watching our poles
melt from global warming, we are losing fresh water sources, and seeing our
cities get ruined with immense amounts of garbage and litter. Despite the damage to natural resources,
individuals still aren't motivated enough to start living more environmentally
healthy lives. This is because it
is more expensive to live environmentally conscious life-styles.
It is
obvious that someone needs to make people think about what they are doing to
our world. The pollution that humans create is an externality. (The
definition of a negative externality is a spillover cost that has to get paid
eventually even if people did not agree to the action that creates that
cost). No one is paying to cover
this cost now, but we will all pay soon with the loss of our resources.
I believe
that in order for people to be more conscious about how important it is to save
our environment, our government needs to get involved. It is the only
structure that has the money and ability to reach every household. However, our
government cannot make this change through creating new laws. When a government
makes its citizens protect their environment through laws, it can lead to laws
that are inconvenient and expensive for citizens. If the government feels that
everyone should only buy goods that were manufactured without releasing a lot
of pollution, it probably means that the goods are more expensive. This
leads to a large percent of the country probably not being able to pay for
them.
Our
government shouldn’t try to protect the environment with laws, but rather to
create incentives to live environmentally friendly lives by rewarding the people
who do so. The government can give
tax cuts or free public parking to individuals who live by the environmentally
friendly standards that the government recommends. Whatever the benefit might
be, people need to realize that not only are they helping their world and their
future generations by making environmentally conscious decisions, but that they
can also benefit (financially) in the short term.
If people do not want to live environmentally healthy lives because of
the financial costs for doing so, then simple economic incentives like saving
money on taxes is an attractive way for a government to convince its citizens to
help the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment